Caution Notice

Volume 1, Issue 2

Home / Journal / Browse Issues / Journal Of General Management Research /
Volume 1, Issue 2

Management of Productivity


Sateesh Kumar Ojha


Faculty of Management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal


Productivity is the major concern of every modern organisations irrespective of their types-business, government, and social. Every organisation strives towards increasing productivity; however, the very few organisations out of the total established have been successful. Hence, this article tries to investigate what factors determine the productivity, what problems occur in the organizations in production process, who is responsible for such non-productive organisations, how can be assessed that organisations are unproductive, how concern authorities from inside the organisations (managers) and outside the organisations (government authorities) tackle the situations, etc., are the issues this articles raised and tried to answer. Based on the information received from the experiences of some authorities of some organisations, this article is prepared. The sample for the information was the employees, managers and government officials. A number of researches done elsewhere were reviewed. Finding suggests that external and internal both the factors are responsible for productivity loss.


Productivity, Productivity Prob- lems, Productivity Council, Productivity Measurement, Benchmarking, Productivity Improvement Program, Job Design.

  1. Ammons, D.N. (2001), Productivity Barriers in the Public Sector, in Holzer and Lee 2004, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 139–64.
  2. Bartel, A.P. (1994), ‘Productivity gains from the implementation of employee training programs’, Industrial Relations, 33: 411–25.
  3. Berman, E.M. (2006), ‘Performance and productivity in public and nonprofit organizations’, New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
  4. Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1978), ‘Trade unions in the production process’, Journal of Political Economy, 86: 355–378.
  5. Covey, Stephen R. (1992), Principle-Centered Leadership. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  6. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (1991), ‘The impact on economic performance of a transformation in industrial relations’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 44: 241–60.
  7. Evan, M.B. (2006), Performance and Productivity in Public and Nonprofit Organisations (2nd ed.), New York: M.E. Sharpe, Armonk.
  8. Focus 3 (2011), Retrieved from http:// performance-driver-model/
  9. Gerhart, B. and Milkovich, G.T. (1992), ‘Employee compensation: Research and practice’, in M.D. Dunnette and L.M. Hough (eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organisational Psychology, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 3: 481–569.
  10. Guzzo, R.A., Jette, R.D. and Katzell, R.A.(1985), ‘The effect of psychologically based intervention programs in worker productivity: A meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 38: 275–91.
  11. Herman, Robert D. (ed.) (2004), Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  12. Holzer, H.J. (1987), ‘Hiring procedures in the firm: Their economic determinants and outcomes’, in M.M. Kleiner, R.N. Block, M. Roomkin and S.W. Salsburg (eds.), Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm, Washington, DC: BNA Press.
  13. Holzer, M. and Seok-Hwan Lee (2004), Public Productivity Handbook, New York: Marcel Dekker.
  14. Katz, H.C., Kochan, T.A. and Gobeille, K.R. (1983), ‘Industrial relations performance, economic performance, and QWL programs: An interplant analysis’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 37: 3–17.
  15. Katz, H.C., Kochan, T.A. and Keefe, J.H. (1987), Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  16. Katz, H.C., Kochan, T.A. and Weber, M.R. (1985), ‘Assessing the effects of industrial relations systems and efforts to improve the quality of working life on organisational effectiveness’, Academy of Management Journal, 28: 509–26.
  17. Kretschmer, T. (2012), ‘Information and communication technologies and productivity growth: A survey of the literature’, OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 195, OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/5k9bh3jllgs7-en
  18. Schuster, M. (1983), ‘The impact of union- management cooperation on productivity and employment’, Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 36: 415–30.
  19. Weitzman, M.L. and Kruse, D.L. (1990), ‘Profit sharing and productivity’, in A.S. Blinder (ed.), Paying for Productivity, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 95–141.
  20. White, B., and Kathryn E. (2005), New Comer, Getting Results: A Guide for Federal Leaders and Managers, VA: Vienna, Management Concepts. Retrieved from http://nepaldestination.blogspot. com/2010/04/industry.html Retrieved from gknepaleyn/data/industrialestates.html Retrieved from http://www.nepalhomepage. com/category/industrial-supplies-and-services/ industrial-estates
  21. Sumanth, D.J. (1984), Productivity Engineering and Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Phusavat, K. (2013). Productivity Management in an Organization: Measurement and Analysis, Bangkok: ToKnowPress.
  23. Warwick Institute of Employment Research (2014), Literature Review on Workforce Innovation, Workforce Productivity, Planning and Modeling in the Health Sector, Preliminary Findings.
  24. OECD (2001), Measuring Productivity Measure- ment of Aggregate and Industry-level Productivity Growth, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  25. Barnard, C.I. (1971), The Functions of Executives,
  26. 13 th aniversy., ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  27. Gulick, L.H. (1936), Notes on the Theory of Organization, L. Gulick and L. Urwick (eds), papers on the Science of Administration, New York: Institute of Public Administration, pp. 3–35.
  28. McGregor, D. (1960), The Human Side of Enterprise, New York: McGraw-Hill.