Caution Notice

Volume 9, Issue 1

Home / Journal / Browse Issues / Journal Of General Management Research /
Volume 9, Issue 1



Vijaya Sinha


Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, Noida


The public expects enterprises to include social concerns in their twenty-first-century strategies. The purpose of this study is to investigate knowledge growth and research distribution in strategic CSR with the help of bibliometric analysis. A bibliometric methodology was implemented using the Scopus database from 2001 to 2021. The search strategy utilized the search of keywords related to strategic corporate social responsibility with certain constraints. VOSviewer was applied to perform the bibliometric analysis of these articles. A total of 2131 documents have been retrieved for the analysis. According to the data, the Journal – of Sustainability Switzerland, and Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management are the two most influential publications in strategic CSR. The two major countries that lead publishing output are the United States and the United Kingdom. Jamali, D, Tuan, L.T, and Bhattacharyya, S. contributed to the maximum to the publications. The number of publications grows just slightly year over year. In late 2015, more emphasis links were created between CSR, commitment to the organization, and firm success.A more comprehensive theory on strategic CSR should be created and implemented as CSR is a corporation's ultimate responsibility to make it more profitable for both society and the enterprise. Current growth patterns indicate publications on “strategic corporate social responsibility” will rise further.


Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Responsibility, Bibliometric Analysis, CSR

  1. Aksnes, D. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159-170. DOI: 10.3152/147154403781776645
  2. Baron, D. P. (2001). Private politics, corporate social responsibility, and integrated strategy. Journal of economics and management strategy, 10(1), 7-45.
  3. Carroll, A. B. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33-42.
  4. Measuring a journals impact. (2022). Retrieved 25 May 2022, from resources/measuring-a-journals-impact
  5. HESLIN, P., and OCHOA, J. (2008). Understanding and developing strategic corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 125-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.002
  6. Husted, B. W., and de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management studies, 43(1), 75-91.
  7. Lantos, G. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal Of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-632. DOI: 10.1108/07363760110410281
  8. Latapí Agudelo, M., Jóhannsdóttir, L., and Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1). DOI:10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
  9. Low, M., and Siegel, D. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of employee-centred corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(5), 691-717. DOI:10.1108/srj-09-2018-0243
  10. McWilliams, A., and Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
  11. Nijhof, A., Schaveling, J., and Zalesky, N. (2019). Business, society, and the need for stewardship orientation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(1), 145-163. DOI:10.1108/jocm-09-2017-0348
  12. Otte, E., and Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of information Science, 28(6), 441-453.
  13. Podrug, N. (2011). The strategic role of managerial stewardship behaviour for achieving corporate citizenship. Ekonomski pregled, 62(7-8), 404-420.
  14. Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92.
  15. Singh, V., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., and Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113-5142. DOI:10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5.
  16. Van Eck, N. J., and Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics,111(2), 1053-1070.
  17. Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., and Rodriguez, N. (2017). Identification and Visualization of the Intellectual Structure in Graphene Research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 2. doi: 10.3389/frma.2017.00007
  18. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., and Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of management studies, 43(8), 1703-1725.
  19. Werther, W., and Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.009
  20. Yang, Z., Su, H., and Sun, W. (2021). Can strategic corporate social responsibility drive corporate innovation?. South African Journal of Business Management, 52(1). DOI:10.4102/sajbm.v52i1.2577