Caution Notice

Volume 7, Issue 1

Home / Journal / Browse Issues / Journal Of General Management Research /
Volume 7, Issue 1

Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Non - Performing Assets, Liquidity and Risk on the Profitability of Public and Private Sector Banks in India

Author(s)

Kanika Soni and Chandan Kumar Tiwari

Affiliations

Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies, NOIDA

Abstract

This study is an attempt to explore the present challenges in Indian banking sector with special emphasis on the rising problem of non- performing assets of the banks in India. For this, net profit ratio was taken as a dependent factor representing the profitability of the banks. Three independent factors were taken into consideration representing different factors affecting the financial performance of banks specifically- Net NPA Ratio, Current Ratio, Capital Adequacy Ratio. A sample size of 10 Indian Banks was taken into consideration, specifically top five public sector banks and top 5 private sector banks on the basis of total assets owned. The financial data taken was of three years i.e. 2016-2018. According to popular literature the Net NPA Ratio and current ratio have a negative relationship with the net profit and the capital adequacy has a positive relationship. The statistical tests that were applied were correlation and regression. Apart from that a graphical analysis of the banks taken as sample size was also done. The results revealed what popular literature states and that is net NPA and current ratios having a significant negative relationship and capital adequacy having a significant positive relationship. The analysis also showed the financial performances of each banks and gave us useful insights on the overall conditions of the private and public sector banks in India

Keywords

NPAs, Current Ratio, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks

References
  1. Adkar, V. A., & Mahal, D. (2016, December). Impact of Non-Performing Assets on Profitability and Productivity with Special Reference to Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. Journal of Indian Management Research and Practices, 1(1), 37-44.
  2. Banking Industry Outlook. (2018). Retrieved August 25, 2018, from Deloitte: https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/fina ncial-services/articles/gx-banking-industry- outlook.html#
  3. Banking Sector in India. (2018, June). Retrieved August 25, 2018, from Indian Brand Equity Foundation: https://www.ibef.org/industry/banking- india.aspx
  4. Bugrov, D., Dietz, & Poppensieker. (2017, January). A brave new world for global banking. Retrieved August 25, 2018, from mckinsey: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial- services/our-insights/a-brave-new-world-for- global-banking
  5. Eljelly, A. (2004, May). Liquidity - profitability tradeoff: An empirical investigation in an emerging market. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 14(2), 48-61.
  6. Ernst & Young. (2018). Global Banking Outlook 2018. Retrieved August 25, 2018, from EY: https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/e y-global-banking-outlook-2018/$File/ey-global- banking-outlook-2018.pdf
  7. Graham, C., & Bordeleau, É. (2010, December). The Impact of Liquidity on Bank Profitability. Bank of Canada Working Paper, 38, 4-23.
  8. Gopalakrishnan, T. (2004). Management of Non - performing assets (a study with reference to public sector banks). In T. Gopalakrishnan, Management of Non - performing assets (a study with reference to public sector banks (pp.74-76). Mumbai: Indian Institute of banking and finance.
  9. Kalbag, C. (2018, July 5). Will the NPA black hole suck in the country's entire banking system? Retrieved August 29, 2018, from Economic Times: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/ banking/finance/banking/will-the-npa-black- hole-suck-in-the-countrys-entire-banking- universe/articleshow/64860941.cms
  10. Naceur, S. B. (2003, October). The Determinants Of The Tunisian Banking Industry Profitability: Panel Evidence. Universite Libre de Tunis working papers, 1-17.
  11. Narula, S., & Singhla, M. (2014, January). Empirical Study on Non Performing Assets of Bank. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 2(1), 194-199.
  12. Olalekan, A., & Adeyinka, S. (2013, October). Capital Adequacy And Banks' Profitability: An Empirical Evidence From Nigeria. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(10), 87-93.
  13. Ostwal, N., & Arora, N. (2014, June). Unearthing The Epidemic Of Non-Performing Assets: A Study Of Public And Private Sector Banks. Managerial Insights, SMS Varanasi, 10(1), 47-52.
  14. Ponce, A. T. (2013, June). What Determines The Profitability Of Banks? Evidence From Spain. Journal of Accounting And Finance, 53(2), 561-568.
  15. Public Sector Banks on Basis of Total Assets. (2018, September 7). Retrieved from moneycontrol: https://www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/marketin fo/totassets/bse/banks-public-sector.html
  16. Rajmal, Chavan, D., Verma, S., & Das, S. (2017, June). Global Banking – Recent developments and future perspectives. RBI Bulletin June 2017, pp. 61-80.
  17. Reserve Bank of India. (2018). Financial stability report. Delhi: Reserve Bank of India.
  18. Riaz, T., Haneef, S., Ramzan, M., Rana, M. A., Ishaq, H. M., & Karim, Y. (2012, April). Impact of Risk Management on Non-Performing Loans and Profitability of Banking Sector of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7), 307-315.
  19. Saleem, Q., & Rehman, R. U. (2011, July). Impacts of liquidity ratios on profitability. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(7), 95-98.
  20. Sharma, M., & Chaudhary, K. (2011, June). Performance of Indian Public Sector Banks and Private Sector Banks: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(3), 249-256.
  21. Sironi, A., Nocera, G., & Iannotta, G. (2007, July). Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(7), 2127- 2149.
  22. Staikouras, C. K., & Wood, G. E. (2004). the determinants of European bank profitablity. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 3(6), 57-68.